|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
harikrishnanm.vepl SEFI Member

Joined: 01 Dec 2014 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:15 am Post subject: TL Tower Design as per IS 802 |
|
|
Dear friends,
I am designing TL tower in STAAD Pro...The leg members of the towers are passing but all the redundant members fail due to the criteria of minimum thickness. some of my redundant and bracings are 45x30x4 L Angle sections.. I am using IS 802 code of practice to design is staad pro.. I am selecting the GALVA1 option in design parameters but even then i get the redundant members failing.. Technically speaking the Kl/r ratio for the redundant members are withing permissible limits ( <250).. Pls help me with this |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Thankful People |
1 user(s) is/are thankful for this post.
anjanasuresh(02-05, 6:25), Thanks harikrishnanm.vepl for his/her post
|
|
Dr. N. Subramanian General Sponsor


Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 5553 Location: Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 3:25 am Post subject: Re: TL Tower Design as per IS 802 |
|
|
harikrishnanm.vepl wrote: | Dear friends,
I am designing TL tower in STAAD Pro...The leg members of the towers are passing but all the redundant members fail due to the criteria of minimum thickness. some of my redundant and bracings are 45x30x4 L Angle sections.. I am using IS 802 code of practice to design is staad pro.. I am selecting the GALVA1 option in design parameters but even then i get the redundant members failing.. Technically speaking the Kl/r ratio for the redundant members are withing permissible limits ( <250).. Pls help me with this |
Dear Er Hari,
If your software has a min. Thickness criteria in built in it, you can either ignore the failing of such redundant bracings or do not include them in the analysis.
Best wishes,
NS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harikrishnanm.vepl SEFI Member

Joined: 01 Dec 2014 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Dr.N.Subramanian
Thanks a lot for your speedy reply sir..Actually the problem was with the KL/r criteria in the design parameters.. Now I could make the sections pass.. Thanks again for your reply sir.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|