View previous topic :: View next topic 
Author 
Message 
k.gangadharan General Sponsor
Joined: 01 Apr 2008 Posts: 204

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:55 am Post subject: sub: IS 16700/2017 


NECESSITY for an EXPLANATORY part to Is 16700 / 2017
In IS codes 1893/2016, 13920/2016 and IS 875 part 3 /2015 and the new code 16700/2017, most of the provisions are inter connected. Some of the clauses in 16700 is confusing with the provisions of the other codes mentioned above .
Generally speaking ,therefore, in my opinion, an explanatory addition to 16700/2017 , in the form of a Special publication,is necessary , interpreting the various clause to understand this new code fully ,and adapt for practical application.
CLAUSE 9.4 , depth of foundation
It is stated that the ebedded depth of foundation, shall be the least of 1/5 of the ht. of bldg. in RAFT foundation and 1/20 of the ht of bldg for piled & piled Raft buildings.
If you examine some of the already constructed tall bldgs , this clause is not observed .
For example Burg Khalifa in Dubai is 828 m high bldg and It is on a piled raft foundation; the pile cap is 3.7 m thick & the piles are 150mm dia and 43 m long and there are 193 such piles & they are not found on rock and is found on dense sandAand supported in the naturally cement cancisiltite conglomeric formations. As per per Cl. 9.4 this building must have an embedment of 828/ 20 embedment length i.e 42 meter below ground level. This means that this building should have a min: of 10 or 12 floors below gr. level. Actually It has a few parking floors.
If you examine some of the other tall buildings already constructed elsewhere also, this is not a requirement . In my opinion 1/15 & 1/20 is not a relevant figure for embedment legth and it may not be practical to provide such length in tall & supertall buidings.
Another important requirement in Tall Buildings is DAMPERS.
This aspect has not been mentioned or highlighted in this code.
In almost all tall builngs, already constructed ,different types of dampers have been used to reduce drift ,lateral deflection and vibrations due to dynamic wind loads.
There are positive Visco Elastic dampers, Tuned Mass dampers, Sloshing Warer Damoers, Tuned Liquid Dampers and Simple Pedulum dampers. Most of the Tall & super tall bldgs. already constructed have used one or other types of dampers.
This aspect needs inclusion in the new code.
thanks & regards
Gangadharan.k
structural consultant
Posted via Email 

Back to top 


Indra Nath Mishra SEFI Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2016 Posts: 2

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:05 am Post subject: sub: IS 16700/2017 


Dear Sir, FYI & N/A pls.
Regards,
I.N.Mishra
On Saturday, 17 March, 2018, 12:52:22 PM IST, k.gangadharan <forum@sefindia.org> wrote:
NECESSITY for an EXPLANATORY part to Is 16700 / 2017
In IS codes 1893/2016, 13920/2016 and IS 875 part 3 /2015 and the new code 16700/2017, most of the provisions are inter connected. Some of the clauses in 16700 is confusing with the provisions of the other codes mentioned above .
Generally speaking ,therefore, in my opinion, an explanatory addition to 16700/2017 , in the form of a Special publication,is necessary , interpreting the various clause to understand this new code fully ,and adapt for practical application.
CLAUSE 9.4 , depth of foundation
It is stated that the ebedded depth of foundation, shall be the least of 1/5 of the ht. of bldg. in RAFT foundation and 1/20 of the ht of bldg for piled & piled Raft buildings.
If you examine some of the already constructed tall bldgs , this clause is not observed .
For example Burg Khalifa in Dubai is 828 m high bldg and It is on a piled raft foundation; the pile cap is 3.7 m thick & the piles are 150mm dia and 43 m long and there are 193 such piles & they are not found on rock and is found on dense sandAand supported in the naturally cement cancisiltite conglomeric formations. As per per Cl. 9.4 this building must have an embedment of 828/ 20 embedment length i.e 42 meter below ground level. This means that this building should have a min: of 10 or 12 floors below gr. level. Actually It has a few parking floors.
If you examine some of the other tall buildings already constructed elsewhere also, this is not a requirement . In my opinion 1/15 & 1/20 is not a relevant figure for embedment legth and it may not be practical to provide such length in tall & supertall buidings.
Another important requirement in Tall Buildings is DAMPERS.
This aspect has not been mentioned or highlighted in this code.
In almost all tall builngs, already constructed ,different types of dampers have been used to reduce drift ,lateral deflection and vibrations due to dynamic wind loads.
There are positive Visco Elastic dampers, Tuned Mass dampers, Sloshing Warer Damoers, Tuned Liquid Dampers and Simple Pedulum dampers. Most of the Tall & super tall bldgs. already constructed have used one or other types of dampers.
This aspect needs inclusion in the new code.
thanks & regards
Gangadharan.k
structural consultant
Posted via Email 

Back to top 


Pulkit Velani SEFI Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 4 Location: Hyderabad, India

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 9:59 am Post subject: Re: sub: IS 16700/2017 


Dear Sir,
With due respect I would like to say regarding CL 9.4: The point you raised might be valid or need discussion, however, the example given by you for Burj Khalifa is not valid since maximum height of building consider as per IS 16700:2017 is 250 m only. Hence maximum embedded depth coming to be: Raft=16.6m (H/15) and Pile=12.5m(H/20).
regards,
Pulkit
k.gangadharan wrote:  NECESSITY for an EXPLANATORY part to Is 16700 / 2017
CLAUSE 9.4 , depth of foundation
It is stated that the ebedded depth of foundation, shall be the least of 1/5 of the ht. of bldg. in RAFT foundation and 1/20 of the ht of bldg for piled & piled Raft buildings.
If you examine some of the already constructed tall bldgs , this clause is not observed .
For example Burg Khalifa in Dubai is 828 m high bldg and It is on a piled raft foundation; the pile cap is 3.7 m thick & the piles are 150mm dia and 43 m long and there are 193 such piles & they are not found on rock and is found on dense sandAand supported in the naturally cement cancisiltite conglomeric formations. As per per Cl. 9.4 this building must have an embedment of 828/ 20 embedment length i.e 42 meter below ground level. This means that this building should have a min: of 10 or 12 floors below gr. level. Actually It has a few parking floors.
If you examine some of the other tall buildings already constructed elsewhere also, this is not a requirement . In my opinion 1/15 & 1/20 is not a relevant figure for embedment legth and it may not be practical to provide such length in tall & supertall buidings.
thanks & regards
Gangadharan.k
structural consultant
Posted via Email 


Back to top 


ssankaran SEFI Member
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 4

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 4:21 pm Post subject: sub: IS 16700/2017 


Well said. Embedment depth can only be suggestive and not mandatory.S Sankaran
On 17Mar2018 12:50 PM, "k.gangadharan" <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote: Quote:  NECESSITY for an EXPLANATORY part to Is 16700 / 2017
In IS codes 1893/2016, 13920/2016 and IS 875 part 3 /2015 and the new code 16700/2017, most of the provisions are inter connected. Some of the clauses in 16700 is confusing with the provisions of the other codes mentioned above .
Generally speaking ,therefore, in my opinion, an explanatory addition to 16700/2017 , in the form of a Special publication,is necessary , interpreting the various clause to understand this new code fully ,and adapt for practical application.
CLAUSE 9.4 , depth of foundation
It is stated that the ebedded depth of foundation, shall be the least of 1/5 of the ht. of bldg. in RAFT foundation and 1/20 of the ht of bldg for piled & piled Raft buildings.
If you examine some of the already constructed tall bldgs , this clause is not observed .
For example Burg Khalifa in Dubai is 828 m high bldg and It is on a piled raft foundation; the pile cap is 3.7 m thick & the piles are 150mm dia and 43 m long and there are 193 such piles & they are not found on rock and is found on dense sandAand supported in the naturally cement cancisiltite conglomeric formations. As per per Cl. 9.4 this building must have an embedment of 828/ 20 embedment length i.e 42 meter below ground level. This means that this building should have a min: of 10 or 12 floors below gr. level. Actually It has a few parking floors.
If you examine some of the other tall buildings already constructed elsewhere also, this is not a requirement . In my opinion 1/15 & 1/20 is not a relevant figure for embedment legth and it may not be practical to provide such length in tall & supertall buidings.
Another important requirement in Tall Buildings is DAMPERS.
This aspect has not been mentioned or highlighted in this code.
In almost all tall builngs, already constructed ,different types of dampers have been used to reduce drift ,lateral deflection and vibrations due to dynamic wind loads.
There are positive Visco Elastic dampers, Tuned Mass dampers, Sloshing Warer Damoers, Tuned Liquid Dampers and Simple Pedulum dampers. Most of the Tall & super tall bldgs. already constructed have used one or other types of dampers.
This aspect needs inclusion in the new code.
thanks & regards
Gangadharan.k
structural consultant

Posted via Email 

Back to top 


dipak_bhattacharya ...
Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Posts: 71

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 1:15 pm Post subject: sub: IS 16700/2017 


Dear moderators,
Whether depth of embedments have been appropriately defined in the new code IS 16700.
Though , in case of Raft foundations, embedments may be upto bottom of raft, what should be depth of embedment for buildings based on piled foundations, whether it should be upto bottom of pile caps or upto the ends pf pile lengths.
Regards,
Dipak Bhattacharya / Delhi.
On 17 March 2018 at 12:50, k.gangadharan <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:
Quote:  NECESSITY for an EXPLANATORY part to Is 16700 / 2017
In IS codes 1893/2016, 13920/2016 and IS 875 part 3 /2015 and the new code 16700/2017, most of the provisions are inter connected. Some of the clauses in 16700 is confusing with the provisions of the other codes mentioned above .
Generally speaking ,therefore, in my opinion, an explanatory addition to 16700/2017 , in the form of a Special publication,is necessary , interpreting the various clause to understand this new code fully ,and adapt for practical application.
CLAUSE 9.4 , depth of foundation
It is stated that the ebedded depth of foundation, shall be the least of 1/5 of the ht. of bldg. in RAFT foundation and 1/20 of the ht of bldg for piled & piled Raft buildings.
If you examine some of the already constructed tall bldgs , this clause is not observed .
For example Burg Khalifa in Dubai is 828 m high bldg and It is on a piled raft foundation; the pile cap is 3.7 m thick & the piles are 150mm dia and 43 m long and there are 193 such piles & they are not found on rock and is found on dense sandAand supported in the naturally cement cancisiltite conglomeric formations. As per per Cl. 9.4 this building must have an embedment of 828/ 20 embedment length i.e 42 meter below ground level. This means that this building should have a min: of 10 or 12 floors below gr. level. Actually It has a few parking floors.
If you examine some of the other tall buildings already constructed elsewhere also, this is not a requirement . In my opinion 1/15 & 1/20 is not a relevant figure for embedment legth and it may not be practical to provide such length in tall & supertall buidings.
Another important requirement in Tall Buildings is DAMPERS.
This aspect has not been mentioned or highlighted in this code.
In almost all tall builngs, already constructed ,different types of dampers have been used to reduce drift ,lateral deflection and vibrations due to dynamic wind loads.
There are positive Visco Elastic dampers, Tuned Mass dampers, Sloshing Warer Damoers, Tuned Liquid Dampers and Simple Pedulum dampers. Most of the Tall & super tall bldgs. already constructed have used one or other types of dampers.
This aspect needs inclusion in the new code.
thanks & regards
Gangadharan.k
structural consultant

Posted via Email 

Back to top 




You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum


