View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yogesh101 SEFI Member

Joined: 04 Dec 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 6:23 am Post subject: Regarding Design of Plinth Beam |
|
|
Do we need to design plinth beam to its span? While designing a building in etabs, the r/f of plinth beam of 7m is very less even with minimum section size. So, i'm confused whether it should be designed according to its span or not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hishamajmalpc Progressive Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2015 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
what you meant by 'design by its span'? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yogesh101 SEFI Member

Joined: 04 Dec 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I meant was, we design the depth as span/(12-15). Do i need to do that for plinth beam? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hishamajmalpc Progressive Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2015 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
span/12 is for prliminary sizing of beam. You should check this depth for flexure,shear and deflection. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. N. Subramanian General Sponsor


Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 5442 Location: Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: Regarding Design of Plinth Beam |
|
|
Dear Er Yogesh
Plinth beams are normally supporting considerable height of brickwork and hence act as composite beams. Hence they need not be designed for the normal BM. In such cases, for normal spans of 3-4 m, we assume a depth of 150 mm to 200 mm only and design for a BM of Wl^2/30. See also the IS code on piles(I think it is IS 2911). Usually 2 nos 12 mm bars are provided at top and bottom
Best wishes
Subramanian
Yogesh101 wrote: | Do we need to design plinth beam to its span? While designing a building in etabs, the r/f of plinth beam of 7m is very less even with minimum section size. So, i'm confused whether it should be designed according to its span or not. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hishamajmalpc Progressive Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2015 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir,
Most of the cases there will be openings in wall (Doors/windows). Can we assume composite action in those cases? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yogesh101 SEFI Member

Joined: 04 Dec 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 11:34 am Post subject: Re: Regarding Design of Plinth Beam |
|
|
Thank You Sir, for your clarification. I got it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ujjwal SEFI Member

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:53 pm Post subject: Re: Regarding Design of Plinth Beam |
|
|
Dr. N. Subramanian wrote: | Dear Er Yogesh
Plinth beams are normally supporting considerable height of brickwork and hence act as composite beams. Hence they need not be designed for the normal BM. In such cases, for normal spans of 3-4 m, we assume a depth of 150 mm to 200 mm only and design for a BM of Wl^2/30. See also the IS code on piles(I think it is IS 2911). Usually 2 nos 12 mm bars are provided at top and bottom
Best wishes
Subramanian
Yogesh101 wrote: | Do we need to design plinth beam to its span? While designing a building in etabs, the r/f of plinth beam of 7m is very less even with minimum section size. So, i'm confused whether it should be designed according to its span or not. |
|
The experience with 150 or 200 mm depth was not satisfactory as hundreds of buildings in expansive soil developed cracks in masonry. We ,therefore, provide depth and reinforcement considering the entire dead weight to be supported by the beam. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
someshwar ganti General Sponsor

Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I feel that a Plinth beam cannot be designed as a Normal Continuous beam like that in a Roof beam.
1. the Plinth beam is Normally casted on a CRS masonry, which gives it support through out the length of the BEAM hence our normal BM equations will not really apply,
Please note for a roof beam the wall is constructed much later hence normal equations apply.
Besides the Wall load on the plinth beam, most of the sites (especially factory sheds etc) will have tractors, tippers running on the some of the bays of the plinth beams, These beams survive only because there is a CRS wall supporting the beam through out.
hence in my opinion , design it as a normal beam because the construction loads on plinth beams (atleast in some bays ) is much higher than the wall load on the beams, in such a case the CRS support below the beam will prevent the deflection etc hence the failure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ujjwal SEFI Member

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
someshwar ganti wrote: | I feel that a Plinth beam cannot be designed as a Normal Continuous beam like that in a Roof beam.
1. the Plinth beam is Normally casted on a CRS masonry, which gives it support through out the length of the BEAM hence our normal BM equations will not really apply,
Please note for a roof beam the wall is constructed much later hence normal equations apply.
Besides the Wall load on the plinth beam, most of the sites (especially factory sheds etc) will have tractors, tippers running on the some of the bays of the plinth beams, These beams survive only because there is a CRS wall supporting the beam through out.
hence in my opinion , design it as a normal beam because the construction loads on plinth beams (atleast in some bays ) is much higher than the wall load on the beams, in such a case the CRS support below the beam will prevent the deflection etc hence the failure. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|