|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
drsahoo E-Conference Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2022 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 12:04 pm Post subject: Review of Existing Practices |
|
|
Dear Colleagues:
Welcome to the e-conference for Discussion on New BIS document SSD-II 06 (19914) : REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES.
The topic of this thread is Review of Existing Practices.
Currently, we have different models of appointment of Principal Design Consultant (PDC) and different categories of proof checking based on their level of independence. Under this topic/thread, we would deliberate on the advantages/disadvantages of these models as well as the way forward in retaining some of these existing practices.
I will be moderating the discussions of this topic/thread. I request you to send/post inputs as close as possible to the topic/thread. This will help in the final compilation and consolidation of the discussions.
Thank you, and looking for a spirited and effective e-conference.
Dipti Ranjan Sahoo
(Moderator)
Posted via Email
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikram.jeet General Sponsor

Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 3706
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Existing Practices :
PDC - Prime design Consultant
PC- Proof Consultant
1.0 In absence of this much awaited code , existing practices are only for some high value projects like Bridges , Flyovers , and some other important projects of Govt.
Review needed : All Structural works needs to be covered under PDC + PC with exception that small works can be under PDC only (pC can be skipped)( See prev posts from my end on Applicability of code)
2,0 Model 1 : Existing practice is that owner appoints proof Consultant and Const Agency appoints Their PDC. It is prevailing in Turn key Projects.
Review needed : It is OK , no need to change
3.0 Model 2 : Owner appoints PDC , but do not appoint any external PC . Owner having its own design deptt act as PC. It saves extra cost to Owner.
Review needed : expertise of special structures may not be available with Owner design Department acting as PC , and Review becomes eyewash. Hence if Owner wants to act as PC , it may be discouraged and external PC be appointed .
4.0 Model 3.0 : Owner with its in house design deptt act as PDC ,but no PC is done . This happens in some Govt and mega Construction Agencies.
Review Needed : Owner design Deptt can act as PDC as talent is available everywhere. But It must be vetted by third Party PC .
5.0 Model 4.0 Same as Above 4.0 but Owner sends it design to Engg institute for vetting , some Professor vett it.
Review needed : It is OK, if it satisfies , but Institute vetting be on some selected works
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rathinavel SEFI Member

Joined: 30 May 2020 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 1:30 pm Post subject: Review of Existing Practices |
|
|
Firstly, I could not understand the reason for calling Structural Designer as “Principal Design Consultant(PDC)” as it gives the meaning of “Comprehensive Design consultant”, where the organization holds the responsibility to deliver design covering all Disciplines
Calling Structural Design Consultant(SDC) or Lead/ Principal Structural Design Consultant would be appropriate
What is the role/responsibility expected from Principal Design consultant in UK regulations are very different.(Refer attachment)
In my view, currently no such regulations are present in India. Establishing this may be necessary.
Regards,
Rathinavel
From: drsahoo <forum@sefindia.org>
Sent: 29 August 2022 17:36
To: econf@sefindia.org
Subject: [ECONF] Review of Existing Practices
CAUTION: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Colleagues:
Welcome to the e-conference for Discussion on New BIS document SSD-II 06 (19914) : REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES.
The topic of this thread is Review of Existing Practices.
Currently, we have different models of appointment of Principal Design Consultant (PDC) and different categories of proof checking based on their level of independence. Under this topic/thread, we would deliberate on the advantages/disadvantages of these models as well as the way forward in retaining some of these existing practices.
I will be moderating the discussions of this topic/thread. I request you to send/post inputs as close as possible to the topic/thread. This will help in the final compilation and consolidation of the discussions.
Thank you, and looking for a spirited and effective e-conference.
Dipti Ranjan Sahoo
(Moderator)
--auto removed--
Posted via Email
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
89.17 KB |
Viewed: |
59 Time(s) |

|
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses. Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
Description: |
|
 Download |
Filename: |
Are_you_a_principal_designer__–_Design_team_responsibilities.pdf |
Filesize: |
130.85 KB |
Downloaded: |
85 Time(s) |
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses. Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
|
Description: |
|
 Download |
Filename: |
Construction_-_Principal_designers__roles_and_responsibilities_CDM_2015.pdf |
Filesize: |
115 KB |
Downloaded: |
86 Time(s) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|