www.sefindia.org

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

 Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptions DigestDigest Preferences   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister FAQSecurity Tips FAQDonate
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum 
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

Review of Existing Practices

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> E-CONFERENCE on SSD-II 06(19914) REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
drsahoo
E-Conference Moderator


Joined: 27 Aug 2022
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 12:04 pm    Post subject: Review of Existing Practices Reply with quote

Dear Colleagues:
 Welcome to the e-conference for Discussion on New BIS document SSD-II 06 (19914) : REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES.
 The topic of this thread is Review of Existing Practices.


Currently, we have different models of appointment of Principal Design Consultant (PDC) and different categories of proof checking based on their level of independence. Under this topic/thread, we would deliberate on the advantages/disadvantages of these models as well as the way forward in retaining some of these existing practices.  
I will be moderating the discussions of this topic/thread. I request you to send/post inputs as close as possible to the topic/thread. This will help in the final compilation and consolidation of the discussions. 
 Thank you, and looking for a spirited and effective e-conference.
 Dipti Ranjan Sahoo
(Moderator)
 

Quote:
--
Dipti Ranjan Sahoo, PhD
FICE,FIEI,FISET
Professor of Structural Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
New Delhi-110016 (INDIA)
email: drsahoo@civil.iitd.ac.in (drsahoo@civil.iitd.ac.in)
tel: (+91) 11 26591203
http://web.iitd.ac.in/~drsahoo


Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vikram.jeet
General Sponsor
General Sponsor


Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 3706

PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Existing Practices :
PDC - Prime design Consultant
PC- Proof Consultant

1.0 In absence of this much awaited code , existing practices are only for some high value projects like Bridges   , Flyovers , and some other important projects of Govt.

Review needed : All Structural works needs to be covered under PDC + PC  with exception that  small works can be under PDC only (pC  can be skipped)( See prev posts from my end on Applicability of code)

2,0 Model 1 : Existing practice is that owner appoints proof Consultant and Const Agency appoints Their  PDC. It is prevailing in  Turn key Projects.


Review needed :  It is OK , no need to change

3.0 Model 2 : Owner appoints PDC  , but do not appoint any external PC . Owner having its own design deptt act as PC. It saves extra cost to Owner.

Review needed : expertise of special structures may not be available with Owner design Department  acting as PC , and Review becomes eyewash. Hence if Owner wants to act as PC , it may be discouraged and external PC be appointed .

4.0 Model 3.0 :  Owner with its in house  design deptt act as PDC ,but no  PC  is done . This happens in some Govt and mega Construction  Agencies.

Review Needed : Owner design Deptt can act as PDC as talent is available everywhere. But It must be vetted by third Party PC .

5.0 Model 4.0  Same as Above 4.0 but Owner sends it design to Engg institute for vetting , some Professor  vett it.

Review needed :  It is OK,  if it satisfies , but Institute vetting be on some selected works
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rathinavel
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 30 May 2020
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 1:30 pm    Post subject: Review of Existing Practices Reply with quote

Firstly, I could not understand the reason for calling Structural Designer as “Principal Design Consultant(PDC)” as it gives the meaning of “Comprehensive Design consultant”, where the organization holds the responsibility to deliver design covering all Disciplines
Calling Structural Design Consultant(SDC) or Lead/ Principal Structural Design Consultant would be appropriate

What is the role/responsibility expected from Principal Design consultant in UK regulations are very different.(Refer attachment)

In my view, currently no such regulations are present in India. Establishing this may be necessary.  

Regards,
Rathinavel

From: drsahoo <forum@sefindia.org>
Sent: 29 August 2022 17:36
To: econf@sefindia.org
Subject: [ECONF] Review of Existing Practices



CAUTION: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.      
Dear Colleagues:
Welcome to the e-conference for Discussion on New BIS document SSD-II 06 (19914) : REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES.
The topic of this thread is Review of Existing Practices.


Currently, we have different models of appointment of Principal Design Consultant (PDC) and different categories of proof checking based on their level of independence. Under this topic/thread, we would deliberate on the advantages/disadvantages of these models as well as the way forward in retaining some of these existing practices.
I will be moderating the discussions of this topic/thread. I request you to send/post inputs as close as possible to the topic/thread. This will help in the final compilation and consolidation of the discussions.
Thank you, and looking for a spirited and effective e-conference.
Dipti Ranjan Sahoo
(Moderator)

--auto removed--

Posted via Email



image001.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  89.17 KB
 Viewed:  59 Time(s)

image001.png



Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
Are_you_a_principal_designer__–_Design_team_responsibilities.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  Are_you_a_principal_designer__–_Design_team_responsibilities.pdf
 Filesize:  130.85 KB
 Downloaded:  85 Time(s)


Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
Construction_-_Principal_designers__roles_and_responsibilities_CDM_2015.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  Construction_-_Principal_designers__roles_and_responsibilities_CDM_2015.pdf
 Filesize:  115 KB
 Downloaded:  86 Time(s)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> E-CONFERENCE on SSD-II 06(19914) REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA, Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. advertisement policy