www.sefindia.org

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

 Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptions DigestDigest Preferences   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister FAQSecurity Tips FAQDonate
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum 
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools  before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

Licensing and Registration of Structural Engineers_clause 9.2

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> E-CONFERENCE on SSD-II 06(19914) REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
drnbodigece
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 13 May 2020
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 7:30 am    Post subject: Licensing and Registration of Structural Engineers_clause 9.2 Reply with quote

 Dear sir,
I am happy to participate the in the E-conference on 'REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES - Doc. No.: SSD II/06(19914)'.
I would like to bring your kind attention that clause 9.2 Qualification and Experience. In table 1, at bottom most line it mentioned that academic faculty also become a PDC or PC but in majority case Academic faculty start with carrier in teaching instead of working industry and join in academics. Many case academician can also do designs and proof checking of structures but due to limitation on industry experience they are not eligible to take any project.  If you relax clause 9.2 and make some set of guideline for academician, it will encourage to participate more people and share the knowledge both industry and academia.  
I feel that academician who do not have industry experience but he/she has qualified in structural Engineering and sound knowledge in structural software’s or design codes,  may be given eligibility in PC level instead of PDC a the beginning. Think of this clause 9.2.
I hope it may be discussed and hopefully expect some suitable guidelines for academician (NO industry experiences).

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adeelafreen
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2022 8:30 am    Post subject: Licensing and Registration of Structural Engineers_clause 9.2 Reply with quote

Hi sir, 

I do agree with this point raised by @drnbodigece. There is a big gap between academician and any Engineering consultant because here higher degree doesn't fetch us any such work and add no value to the approach that is why this gap is developing.


Warm regards,

Adeela Afreen
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022, 13:07 drnbodigece, <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:

Quote:
            Dear sir,
I am happy to participate the in the E-conference on 'REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES - Doc. No.: SSD II/06(19914)'.
I would like to bring your kind attention that clause 9.2 Qualification and Experience. In table 1, at bottom most line it mentioned that academic faculty also become a PDC or PC but in majority case Academic faculty start with carrier in teaching instead of working industry and join in academics. Many case academician can also do designs and proof checking of structures but due to limitation on industry experience they are not eligible to take any project.  If you relax clause 9.2 and make some set of guideline for academician, it will encourage to participate more people and share the knowledge both industry and academia.
I feel that academician who do not have industry experience but he/she has qualified in structural Engineering and sound knowledge in structural software’s or design codes,  may be given eligibility in PC level instead of PDC a the beginning. Think of this clause 9.2.
I hope it may be discussed and hopefully expect some suitable guidelines for academician (NO industry experiences).
     




     



Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vikram.jeet
General Sponsor
General Sponsor


Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 3706

PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2022 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding  Academia,  Researchers,  Professors of Engg Colleges , Universities

Their role is always in mega projects / Highly special structures  at present,  as as Peer Reviewers. I think they generally do not take role of PDC for want of facilities like trained engineers , Drafting personnels and an independent office. Also since They are on permanent  rolls of University and they may not be permitted to do full time Consultancy  ,but are permitted to work as Consultants for Peer Review  or at the most  PC.

In my humble  opinion role of PC could always be given to  scholors but  with full fledged proof checking of design calcs and drawing details .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Thank Post    www.sefindia.org Forum Index -> E-CONFERENCE on SSD-II 06(19914) REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA, Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. advertisement policy