View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
P.K.Mallick General Sponsor


Joined: 14 Dec 2008 Posts: 1098 Location: Kanpur. p.k.mallick1962@gmail.com
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:32 am Post subject: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING. |
|
|
The building is G+3(Ground +3 upper floors). It was constructed sometimes in early Eighty. Structural Drawings are not available. There were dowels left in columns for vertical extension. Dowels left for vertical extension appear to be adequate for extension of one more floor. Since structural drawings are not available, theoretically it cannot be determined whether foundations have been designed for G+3 (Ground +3 upper floors) or G+4(Ground +4 upper floors).
Is there any way out? How to determine whether vertical extension is possible or not? _________________ P.K.Mallick
p.k.mallick1962@gmail.com
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sakumar79 ...

Joined: 18 Apr 2008 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps footings can be exposed at a few locations (only peripheral columns will be feasible) to estimate load capacity and a rough estimate can be made to check if load with the extra floor is within limits... If this is reasonable at a few locations, it may be proceeded with an extra floor...
Otherwise, you can think of going for Truss roof with Aerocon blocks to reduce the extra load on the footings.
Arun |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ibarua General Sponsor

Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 1039
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING. |
|
|
9th Feb 2009
Re.: Vertical extension of old building
No way to determine soundness of design and construction without proper records, except to go in for expensive and time consuming non-destructive testing.
Best to leave such old "unengineered" (without any drawings and /or records of construction)structures alone.
Indrajit Barua.
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 P.K.Mallick wrote :
Quote: | The building is G+3(Ground +3 upper floors). It was constructed sometimes in early Eighty. Structural Drawings are not available. There were dowels left in columns for vertical extension. Dowels left for vertical extension appear to be adequate for extension of one more floor. Since structural drawings are not available, theoretically it cannot be determined whether foundations have been designed for G+3 (Ground +3 upper floors) or G+4(Ground +4 upper floors). Is there any way out? How to determine whether vertical extension is possible or not?
------------------------ P.K.Mallick munamallick@yahoo.co.in mallick.pravatkumar@gmail.com http://360.yahoo.com/munamallick
|
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mks ...


Joined: 27 Dec 2008 Posts: 82 Location: Patna: email mks.b08@gmail.com
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Sir,
Les us assume after exposing the footing, if it is observed that , pile foundation is adopted. in that case what will be the solution.
Regards
Mithilesh
sakumar79 wrote: | Perhaps footings can be exposed at a few locations (only peripheral columns will be feasible) to estimate load capacity and a rough estimate can be made to check if load with the extra floor is within limits... If this is reasonable at a few locations, it may be proceeded with an extra floor...
Otherwise, you can think of going for Truss roof with Aerocon blocks to reduce the extra load on the footings.
Arun |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chandra SEFI Member

Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:39 pm Post subject: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING. |
|
|
A thoughtful and proper assessment I think is the first step. Not forgetting that the building’s almost 30 years old i.e. it’s through its half life. Costlier and detailed assessment will give closer results. Please assume greater responsibility if this is a hospital or a school building, or some very important facility.
Regards,
Chandra
From: ibarua [mailto:forum@sefindia.org]
Sent: 09 February 2009 18:49
To: general@sefindia.org
Subject: [SEFI] Re: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING.
9th Feb 2009
Re.: Vertical extension of old building
No way to determine soundness of design and construction without proper records, except to go in for expensive and time consuming non-destructive testing.
Best to leave such old "unengineered" (without any drawings and /or records of construction)structures alone.
Indrajit Barua.
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 P.K.Mallick wrote :
--auto removed--
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sakumar79 ...

Joined: 18 Apr 2008 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
As I mentioned, if it is not feasible to verify foundation capacity you can go for aerocon blocks with truss roof... This will not overload the structure too much even if it has been designed for G+3 only.
Arun |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
P.K.Mallick General Sponsor


Joined: 14 Dec 2008 Posts: 1098 Location: Kanpur. p.k.mallick1962@gmail.com
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
My question is "whether there is any scientific way to assess the load carrying capacity of foundations of an old building". Any methodology explained in any of the publications? Whether somebody has carried out this type of work? If yes,then how it has been assessed? _________________ P.K.Mallick
p.k.mallick1962@gmail.com
Last edited by P.K.Mallick on Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pravin.pai General Sponsor

Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 71 Location: Mumbai
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:21 am Post subject: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING. |
|
|
Dear Mr Mallick:
As a good CE, it is not advisable to go in for extra loading, 'blind-folded'. Remember a Bandra (East) building collapse some years ago wherein a Str.Engr. of reputed stature had added 3 more floors to a building also previously designed by him.
Moreover, if this project of yours is in Mumbai, remember underground drainage leakages deteriorates the foundations more than the super structure.
So without earlier str.dwgs. do not risk additional load
regards
pravin pai
On 2/9/09, P.K.Mallick <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote: Quote: | The building is G+3(Ground +3 upper floors). It was constructed sometimes in early Eighty. Structural Drawings are not available. There were dowels left in columns for vertical extension. Dowels left for vertical extension appear to be adequate for extension of one more floor. Since structural drawings are not available, theoretically it cannot be determined whether foundations have been designed for G+3 (Ground +3 upper floors) or G+4(Ground +4 upper floors).
Is there any way out? How to determine whether vertical extension is possible or not?
P.K.Mallick
munamallick@yahoo.co.in (munamallick@yahoo.co.in)
mallick.pravatkumar@gmail.com (mallick.pravatkumar@gmail.com)
http://360.yahoo.com/munamallick
|
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikram.jeet General Sponsor

Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 2212
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:38 am Post subject: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING. |
|
|
CBRI Roorkee may be checked up for undertaking such studies
on old buildings and their foundations
vikramjeet
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sdec.in Silver Sponsor

Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:25 am Post subject: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING. |
|
|
with Pile foundations, it's going to be very tricky,as it maybe difficult to examine the no and spacing and exact arrangement of piles. it's length below cut-off lvl, grade of concrete used and r/f provided in piles.
Let's hope it's isolated footings, otherwise the ptoblem at hand will become more complex and almost unmanageable(will need elaborate investigations by a Professional agencyand in fact the cost thus incurred maybe very steep).
Regards
Sangeeta Wij
Quote: | ----- Original Message -----
From: mks (forum@sefindia.org)
To: general@sefindia.org (general@sefindia.org)
Sent: 09 February, 2009 6:52 PM
Subject: [SEFI] Re: VERTICAL EXTENSION OF OLD BUILDING.
Dear Sir,
Les us assume after exposing the footing, if it is observed that , pile foundation is adopted. in that case what will be the solution.
Regards
Mithilesh
sakumar79 wrote: Perhaps footings can be exposed at a few locations (only peripheral columns will be feasible) to estimate load capacity and a rough estimate can be made to check if load with the extra floor is within limits... If this is reasonable at a few locations, it may be proceeded with an extra floor...
Otherwise, you can think of going for Truss roof with Aerocon blocks to reduce the extra load on the footings.
Arun
|
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|